Relatives' Heartache Over Coastal Erosion Threatening Norfolk Graves
Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.
Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”
The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.