🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where African descendants are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to remove the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Black History is Now Month.