🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are considering similar measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". A law may be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," stated a leading parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "based on robust research".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a young person who died after viewing harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to copy the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, additional states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this global debate unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers show that states around the world are less and less willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.